Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 621
Filtrar
1.
Implement Sci ; 17(1): 52, 2022 07 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35907877

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Implementation strategies are aimed at improving guideline adherence. Both effect and process evaluations are conducted to provide insights into the success or failure of these strategies. In our study, we evaluate the nationwide implementation of standardized structured reporting (SSR) in pathology. METHODS: An interrupted time series analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of a previously developed implementation strategy, which consisted of various digitally available elements, on SSR in pathology laboratories. A segmented regression analysis was performed to analyze the change in mean SSR percentages directly after the strategy introduction for pathology reporting and specific subcategories. In addition, we analyzed the change in trend in the weekly percentages after strategy introduction, also for subgroups of tumor groups, retrieval methods, and type of laboratory. The change in SSR use after the strategy introduction was determined for all pathology laboratories. We further conducted a process evaluation in which the exposure to the strategy elements was determined. Experiences of the users with all strategy elements and the remaining barriers and potential strategy elements were evaluated through an eSurvey. We also tested whether exposure to a specific element and a combination of elements resulted in a higher uptake of SSR after strategy introduction. RESULTS: There was a significant increase in an average use of SSR after the strategy introduction for reporting of gastrointestinal (p=.018) and urological (p=.003) oncological diagnoses. A significant increase was present for all oncological resections as a group (p=.007). Thirty-three out of 42 pathology laboratories increased SSR use after the strategy introduction. The "Feedback button", an option within the templates for SSR to provide feedback to the provider and one of the elements of the implementation strategy, was most frequently used by the SSR users, and effectiveness results showed that it increased average SSR use after the strategy introduction. Barriers were still present for SSR implementation. CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide SSR implementation improved for specific tumor groups and retrieval methods. The next step will be to further improve the use of SSR and, simultaneously, to further develop potential benefits of high SSR use, focusing on re-using discrete pathology data. In this way, we can facilitate proper treatment decisions in oncology.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Adhesión a Directriz , Patología/métodos , Informe de Investigación/normas , Neoplasias Urológicas/patología , Retroalimentación , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Humanos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Laboratorios/normas , Patología/normas , Análisis de Regresión , Informe de Investigación/tendencias
2.
PLoS One ; 17(1): e0261398, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35020749

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To quantify changes in adherence to mask and distancing guidelines in outdoor settings in Philadelphia, PA before and after President Trump announced he was infected with COVID-19. METHODS: We used Systematic Observation of Masking Adherence and Distancing (SOMAD) to assess mask adherence in parks, playgrounds, and commercial streets in the 10 City Council districts in Philadelphia PA. We compared adherence rates between August and September 2020 and after October 2, 2020. RESULTS: Disparities in mask adherence existed by age group, gender, and race/ethnicity, with females wearing masks correctly more often than males, seniors having higher mask use than other age groups, and Asians having higher adherence than other race/ethnicities. Correct mask use did not increase after the City released additional mask guidance in September but did after Oct 2. Incorrect mask use also decreased, but the percentage not having masks at all was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Vulnerability of leadership appears to influence population behavior. Public health departments likely need more resources to effectively and persuasively communicate critical safety messages related to COVID-19 transmission.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Máscaras/tendencias , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/virología , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Philadelphia , Distanciamiento Físico , Salud Pública , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Adulto Joven
3.
Pediatrics ; 149(2)2022 02 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35059724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Emergency department visits for anaphylaxis have increased considerably over the past few decades, especially among children. Despite this, anaphylaxis management remains highly variable and contributes to significant health care spending. On the basis of emerging evidence, in this quality improvement project we aimed to safely decrease hospitalization rates, increase the use of cetirizine, and decrease use of corticosteroids for children with anaphylaxis by December 31, 2019. METHODS: A multipronged intervention strategy including a revised evidence-based guideline was implemented at a tertiary children's teaching hospital by using the Model for Improvement. Statistical process control was used to evaluate for changes in key measures. Length of stay and unplanned return visits within 72 hours were monitored as process and balancing measures, respectively. As a national comparison, hospitalization rates were compared with other hospitals' data from the Pediatric Health Information System. RESULTS: Hospitalizations decreased significantly from 28.5% to 11.2% from preimplementation to implementation, and the balancing measure of 72-hour revisits was stable. The proportion of patients receiving cetirizine increased significantly from 4.2% to 59.7% and use of corticosteroids decreased significantly from 72.6% to 32.4% in patients without asthma. The proportion of patients meeting length of stay criteria increased from 53.3% to 59.9%. Hospitalization rates decreased nationally over time. CONCLUSIONS: We reduced hospitalizations for anaphylaxis by 17.3% without concomitant increases in revisits, demonstrating that unnecessary hospitalizations can be safely avoided. The use of a local evidence-based guideline paired with close outcome monitoring and sustained messaging and feedback to clinicians can effectively improve anaphylaxis management.


Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/terapia , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Hospitalización , Hospitales Pediátricos/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/normas , Adolescente , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/epidemiología , Boston/epidemiología , Niño , Preescolar , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/tendencias , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Hospitales Pediátricos/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/tendencias
4.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0261733, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34936693

RESUMEN

The Covid-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of citizens' behaviors in the containment of the virus. Individuals might change their intention to adhere to public health prescriptions depending on various personal characteristics, including their own emotional status, which has been recognized to be a crucial psychological factor in orienting people's adherence to public health recommendation during emergency settings. In particular, it is crucial to support citizens' alliance with authorities and feeling of trust: public engagement is a concept that refers to the general involvement of citizens into public affairs which is generally considered an effective approach to enhance citizens' understanding of their crucial role in public affairs. However, so far there is no agreement on the metrics and indexes that should be used to measures public engagement during a health crisis. The aim of this paper is to validate a psychometric scale (PHEs-E), which intends to measure the readiness of individuals to adhere to the prescribed behavioral change to contain the emergency. Data were collected throughout the pandemic in Italy: in particular, five independent samples were recruited starting from March 2020 to March 2021. Results showed that the proposed measure has good psychometric characteristics. A general linear model was computed to assess the differences of public engagement across the different data points and among citizens with different sociodemographic characteristics. Correlations with other psychological constructs (i.e. Anxiety, Depression and Self-Efficacy) were also tested, showing that more engaged citizens have a lower level of anxiety and depression, and a higher self-efficacy. This study's findings indicate that individuals' characteristics may differentiate citizens' motivation to engage in public health behavioral recommendation to prevent the COVID-19 contagion. However the scale could be useful to perform a psychological monitoring of psychological readiness to engage in public health strategies to face critical events and settings.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Psicometría/métodos , Participación de los Interesados/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , COVID-19/prevención & control , Participación de la Comunidad , Estudios Transversales , Urgencias Médicas , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Cooperación del Paciente/psicología , Salud Pública/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad
5.
PLoS One ; 16(12): e0261439, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34936675

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the first-wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, dentists were considered at high-risk of infection. In France, to stop the spread of SARS-CoV-2, a nationwide lockdown was enforced, during which dentists suspended their routine clinical activities, working solely on dental emergencies. This measure has had an indisputable mitigating effect on the pandemic. To continue protecting dentists after suspension of nationwide lockdown, implementation of preventive measures was recommended, including adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) and room aeration between patients. No study has explored whether implementation of such preventive measures since the end of the first-wave has had an impact on the contamination of dentists. METHODS: An online survey was conducted within a French dentist population between July and September 2020. To explore risk factors associated with COVID-19, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The results showed that COVID-19 prevalence among the 3497 respondents was 3.6%. Wearing surgical masks during non-aerosol generating procedures was a risk factor of COVID-19, whereas reducing the number of patients was a protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the similar COVID-19 prevalence between dentists and the general population, such data suggest that dentists are not overexposed in their work environment when adequate preventive measures are applied. IMPACT: Dentists should wear specific PPE (FFP2, FFP3 or (K)N95 masks) including during non-aerosol generating procedures and reduce the number of patients to allow proper implementation of disinfection and aeration procedures. Considering the similarities between COVID-19 and other viral respiratory infections, such preventive measures may also be of interest to limit emerging variants spread as well as seasonal viral outbreaks.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Equipo de Protección Personal/tendencias , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/métodos , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles/tendencias , Odontólogos/psicología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/prevención & control , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
6.
N Z Med J ; 134(1546): 89-94, 2021 11 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34855737

RESUMEN

AIM: This study determined whether easily used guidelines and an electronic referral process could decrease the age of referral of suspected undescended testes (UDT). An online resource for primary medical practitioners was introduced for which the UDT guideline advises referral to paediatric surgery for testes not sitting spontaneously in the scrotum at three-months corrected age. METHOD: Data were collected prospectively for boys referred with UDT over a seven-year period (2012-2018), during which time agreed GP guidelines on the Community HealthPathways website for referral were introduced. Trends in the age at referral and age at orchidopexy were analysed. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained for 212 boys. Referral before age six months increased from 13% to 61%, and before 12 months from 48% to 78%. Orchidopexy by 12 months increased from 16% to 39%, and by 18 months from 48% to 74%, during the same period. Median age at orchidopexy for this 2012-2018 cohort was 21.6 months compared with 31.1 months from 1997-2007. DISCUSSION: These data demonstrate earlier referral of boys with UDT and earlier orchidopexy corresponded to the introduction of the GP Community HealthPathways website. A similar resource available in other regions or countries also might be expected to reduce the age of referral of suspected UDT from primary care providers.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Internet , Orquidopexia/métodos , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Tiempo de Tratamiento/tendencias , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , Preescolar , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Nueva Zelanda
7.
Biomed Res Int ; 2021: 1126270, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34722756

RESUMEN

In IVF centers, risk assessment applies to complex processes potentially accounting for adverse events and reactions that undergo well-established legislative oversight, and nonconformances (NCs), that lack of established tracking systems. NCs account for an integral part of the quality management system, so that their documentation is important. The study evaluated the performance of a customized tool for incident reporting (IR) to track and characterize NCs in a public IVF center. IVF operators used the IVF-customized IR tool to record NCs at the moment of detection or subsequently, and in a time-saving manner during daily practice. From February 2015 to February 2020, 635 NCs were reported leading to the implementation of 10 operative instructions and 3 procedures with corrective strategies. NCs referred to the IVF laboratory were the most numerically meaningful (454/635, 71.5%). The majority (352/454, 77.5%) accounted for NCs related to procedures of sample management; considering the analytical phase as all the procedures involving sample treatment, the intra-analytical phase (176/352, 50%) has always been more subject to NCs compared to pre- (102/352, 29%) and postanalytical (74/352, 21%) phases. Our experience showed that the IVF-customized IR tool is suitable for application in IVF with regard to NC reports and documentation, as it identifies the most vulnerable steps of treatments. It manages NCs over the time, but it requires a contextual understanding of its application in order to avoid NC underestimates that could negatively influence the safety and quality aspects of IVF treatments.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Gestión de Riesgos/métodos , Documentación , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Italia , Programas Informáticos
8.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21844, 2021 11 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34737319

RESUMEN

This study assesses attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination and the predictive value of COVID-VAC, a novel scale, among adults in the four largest US metropolitan areas and nationally. A 36-item survey of 6037 Americans was conducted in mid-April 2021. The study reports factors for COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among: (1) already vaccinated; (2) unvaccinated but willing to accept a vaccine; and (3) unvaccinated and unwilling to vaccinate. More than 20% were unwilling to vaccinate, expressing concerns about vaccine efficacy and safety and questioning the disease's severity. Poverty, working outside of the home and conservative political views are predictors of unwillingness. Conversely, those who either personally tested positive for COVID-19, or had a family member who did so, were more likely to accept vaccination. Majorities of all respondents supported vaccination mandates for employees and university students. Respondents preferred to receive vaccines in their doctor´s office. Lower income and conservative ideology, but not race, were strongly associated with vaccine unwillingness. The predictive value of COVID-VAC was demonstrated. While vaccination mandates are likely to be accepted, additional effective, targeted interventions to increase vaccine uptake are needed urgently.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Negativa a la Vacunación/psicología , Negativa a la Vacunación/tendencias , Adulto , Actitud , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/provisión & distribución , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Política de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Intención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos , Vacunación/psicología , Vacunación/tendencias , Vacunas/farmacología
9.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21700, 2021 11 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34737373

RESUMEN

With recurring waves of the Covid-19 pandemic, a dilemma facing public health leadership is whether to provide public advice that is medically optimal (e.g., most protective against infection if followed), but unlikely to be adhered to, or advice that is less protective but is more likely to be followed. To provide insight about this dilemma, we examined and quantified public perceptions about the tradeoff between (a) the stand-alone value of health behavior advice, and (b) the advice's adherence likelihood. In a series of studies about preference for public health leadership advice, we asked 1061 participants to choose between (5) strict advice that is medically optimal if adhered to but which is less likely to be broadly followed, and (2) relaxed advice, which is less medically effective but more likely to gain adherence-given varying infection expectancies. Participants' preference was consistent with risk aversion. Offering an informed choice alternative that shifts volition to advice recipients only strengthened risk aversion, but also demonstrated that informed choice was preferred as much or more than the risk-averse strict advice.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Difusión de la Información/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias/prevención & control , Salud Pública/tendencias , Política Pública/tendencias , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad
10.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21675, 2021 11 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34737389

RESUMEN

The recent outbreak of the COVID-19 led to death of millions of people worldwide. To stave off the spread of the virus, the authorities in the US employed different strategies, including the mask mandate order issued by the states' governors. In the current work, we defined a parameter called average death ratio as the monthly average of the number of daily deaths to the monthly average number of daily cases. We utilized survey data to quantify people's abidance by the mask mandate order. Additionally, we implicitly addressed the extent to which people abide by the mask mandate order, which may depend on some parameters such as population, income, and education level. Using different machine learning classification algorithms, we investigated how the decrease or increase in death ratio for the counties in the US West Coast correlates with the input parameters. The results showed that for the majority of counties, the mask mandate order decreased the death ratio, reflecting the effectiveness of such a preventive measure on the West Coast. Additionally, the changes in the death ratio demonstrated a noticeable correlation with the socio-economic condition of each county. Moreover, the results showed a promising classification accuracy score as high as 90%.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/mortalidad , COVID-19/prevención & control , Máscaras/tendencias , California , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Política de Salud , Humanos , Aprendizaje Automático , Máscaras/estadística & datos numéricos , Oregon , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Washingtón
11.
PLoS One ; 16(11): e0260146, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34793555

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Total hip and total knee replacement (THR/TKR) are common and effective surgeries to reduce the pain and disability associated with arthritis but are associated with small but significant risks of preventable complications such as surgical site infection (SSI) and venous-thrombo-embolism (VTE). This study aims to determine the degree to which hospital care was compliant with clinical guidelines for the prevention of SSI and VTE after THR/TKR; and whether non-compliant prophylaxis is associated with increased risk of complications. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A prospective multi-centre cohort study was undertaken in consenting adults with osteoarthritis undergoing elective primary TKR/THR at one of 19 high-volume Australian public or private hospitals. Data were collected prior to surgery and for one-year post-surgery. Four adjusted logistic regression analyses were undertaken to explore associations between binary non-compliance and the risk of surgical complications: (1) composite (simultaneous) non-compliance with both (VTE and antibiotic) guidelines and composite complications [all-cause mortality, VTE, readmission/reoperation for joint-related reasons (one-year) and non-joint-related reasons (35-days)], (2) VTE non-compliance and VTE outcomes, (3) antibiotic non-compliance and any SSI, and (4) antibiotic non-compliance and deep SSI. Data were analysed for 1875 participants. Guideline non-compliance rates were high: 65% (VTE), 87% (antibiotics) and 95% (composite guideline). Composite non-compliance was not associated with composite complication (12.8% vs 8.3%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.41, 95%CI 0.68-3.45, p = 0.40). Non-compliance with VTE guidelines was associated with VTE outcomes (5% vs 2.4%, AOR = 2.83, 95%CI 1.59-5.28,p < 0.001). Non-compliance with antibiotic guidelines was associated with any SSI (14.8% vs 6.1%, AOR = 1.98, 95%CI 1.17-3.62,p = 0.02) but not deep infection (3.7% vs 1.2%,AOR = 2.39, 95%CI 0.85-10.00, p = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: We found high rates of clinical variation and statistically significant associations between non-compliance with VTE and antibiotic guidelines and increased risk of VTE and SSI, respectively. Complications after THR/TKR surgery may be decreased by improving compliance with clinical guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Cooperación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Anciano , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Cadera/métodos , Artroplastia de Reemplazo de Rodilla/métodos , Australia , Estudios de Cohortes , Embolia/prevención & control , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Privados , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Factores de Riesgo , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Trombosis de la Vena/prevención & control
12.
PLoS One ; 16(10): e0258840, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34710126

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Despite the development and enforcement of preventive guidelines by governments, COVID-19 continues to spread across nations, causing unprecedented economic losses and mortality. Public places remain hotspots for COVID-19 transmission due to large numbers of people present; however preventive measures are poorly enforced. Supermarkets are among the high-risk establishments due to the high interactions involved, which makes compliance with the COVID-19 preventive guidelines of paramount importance. However, until now, there has been limited evidence on compliance with the set COVID-19 prevention guidelines. Therefore, this study aimed to measure compliance with the COVID-19 prevention guidelines among supermarkets in Kampala Capital City and Mukono Municipality Uganda. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among selected supermarkets in Kampala Capital City and Mukono Municipality in September 2020. A total of 229 supermarkets (195 in Kampala City and 34 in Mukono Municipality) were randomly selected for the study. Data were collected through structured observations on the status of compliance with COVID-19 prevention guidelines, and entered using the KoboCollect software, which was preinstalled on mobile devices (smart phones and tablets). Descriptive statistics were generated to measure compliance to the set COVID-19 Ministry of Health prevention guidelines using Stata 14 software. RESULTS: Only 16.6% (38/229) of the supermarkets complied with the COVID-19 prevention and control guidelines. In line with the specific measures, almost all supermarkets 95.2% (218/229) had hand washing facilities placed at strategic points such as the entrance, and 59.8% (137/229) of the supermarkets surveyed regularly disinfected commonly touched surfaces. Only 40.6% and 30.6% of the supermarkets enforced mandatory hand washing and use of face masks respectively for all customers accessing the premises. Slightly more than half, 52.4% (120/229) of the supermarkets had someone or a team in charge of enforcing compliance to COVID-19 measures and more than half, 55.5% (127/229) of the supermarkets had not provided their staff with job-specific training/mentorship on infection prevention and control for COVID-19. Less than a third, 26.2% (60/229) of the supermarkets had an infrared temperature gun for screening every customer, and only 5.7% (13/229) of the supermarkets captured details of clients accessing the supermarket as a measure to ease follow-up. CONCLUSION: This study revealed low compliance with COVID-19 guidelines, which required mandatory preventive measures such as face masking, regular disinfection, social distancing, and hand hygiene. This study suggests the need for health authorities to strengthen enforcement of these guidelines, and to sensitise the supermarket managers on COVID-19 in order to increase the uptake of the different measures.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/psicología , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Desinfección de las Manos , Higiene de las Manos , Humanos , Máscaras , Distanciamiento Físico , Política Pública/tendencias , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Supermercados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Uganda
13.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 21(1): 505, 2021 10 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34670499

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Relatively high rates of adherence to myocardial infarction (MI) secondary prevention medications have been reported, but register-based, objective real-world data is scarce. We aimed to analyse adherence to guideline-recommended medications for secondary prevention of MI in 2017 to 2018 (period II) and compare the results with data from 2004 to 2005 (period I) in Estonia. METHODS: Study populations were formed based on data from the Estonian Health Insurance Fund's database and on Estonian Myocardial Infarction Register. By linking to the Estonian Medical Prescription Centre database adherence to guideline-recommended medications for MI secondary prevention was assessed for 1 year follow-up period from the first hospitalization due to MI. Data was analysed using the defined daily dosages methodology. RESULTS: Total of 6694 and 6060 cases of MI were reported in periods I and II, respectively. At least one prescription during the follow up period was found for beta-blockers in 81.0% and 83.5% (p = 0.001), for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) in 76.9% and 66.0% (p < 0.001), and for statins in 44.0% and 67.0% (p < 0.001) of patients in period I and II, respectively. P2Y12 inhibitors were used by 76.4% of patients in period II. The logistic regression analysis adjusted to gender and age revealed that some drugs and drug combinations were not allocated similarly in different age and gender groups. CONCLUSIONS: In Estonia, adherence to MI secondary prevention guideline-recommended medications has improved. But as adherence is still not ideal more attention should be drawn to MI secondary prevention through systematic guideline implementation.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Cardiovasculares/uso terapéutico , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Infarto del Miocardio/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Prevención Secundaria/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Estonia/epidemiología , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , Infarto del Miocardio/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
Circ Heart Fail ; 14(10): e008573, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34587763

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: An unprecedented shift to remote heart failure outpatient care occurred during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Given challenges inherent to remote care, we studied whether remote visits (video or telephone) were associated with different patient usage, clinician practice patterns, and outcomes. METHODS: We included all ambulatory cardiology visits for heart failure at a multisite health system from April 1, 2019, to December 31, 2019 (pre-COVID) or April 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020 (COVID era), resulting in 10 591 pre-COVID in-person, 7775 COVID-era in-person, 1009 COVID-era video, and 2322 COVID-era telephone visits. We used multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regressions with propensity weighting and patient clustering to study ordering practices and outcomes. RESULTS: Compared with in-person visits, video visits were used more often by younger (mean 64.7 years [SD 14.5] versus 74.2 [14.1]), male (68.3% versus 61.4%), and privately insured (45.9% versus 28.9%) individuals (P<0.05 for all). Remote visits were more frequently used by non-White patients (35.8% video, 37.0% telephone versus 33.2% in-person). During remote visits, clinicians were less likely to order diagnostic testing (odds ratio, 0.20 [0.18-0.22] video versus in-person, 0.18 [0.17-0.19] telephone versus in-person) or prescribe ß-blockers (0.82 [0.68-0.99], 0.35 [0.26-0.47]), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (0.69 [0.50-0.96], 0.48 [0.35-0.66]), or loop diuretics (0.67 [0.53-0.85], 0.45 [0.37-0.55]). During telephone visits, clinicians were less likely to prescribe ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) inhibitor/ARB (angiotensin receptor blockers)/ARNIs (angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors; 0.54 [0.40-0.72]). Telephone visits but not video visits were associated with higher rates of 90-day mortality (1.82 [1.14-2.90]) and nonsignificant trends towards higher rates of 90-day heart failure emergency department visits (1.34 [0.97-1.86]) and hospitalizations (1.36 [0.98-1.89]). CONCLUSIONS: Remote visits for heart failure care were associated with reduced diagnostic testing and guideline-directed medical therapy prescription. Telephone but not video visits were associated with increased 90-day mortality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiólogos/tendencias , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Telemedicina/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/tendencias , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/tendencias , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Hospitalización/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Teléfono/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Comunicación por Videoconferencia/tendencias
15.
PLoS One ; 16(8): e0256134, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34437587

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical Site Infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality among operated patients. In spite of the accessibility of universal and national guidelines for surgical prophylaxis, recent studies surveying the present routine of prophylaxis have demonstrated overutilization of a wide range antibacterial medication for a single patient. Few studies have shown qualitatively factors influencing this and perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use. Unfortunately, none of these studies have been done in Tanzania. OBJECTIVE: To describe the perceptions of surgeons on surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use at an urban tertiary hospital. METHODS: A qualitative study involving in-depth interviews with surgeons was conducted in English by the primary investigator. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Systematic text condensation by Malterud was used for data analysis. FINDINGS: Fourteen surgeons and obstetrics and gynaecologists participated. Their perceptions were summarized into three main categories: Inadequate data to support practice; one who sees the patient decides the antibiotic prophylaxis; prolonged antibiotic use for fear of unknown. The participants perceived that choice of antibiotic should be based on local hospital data for bacterial resistance pattern, however the hospital guidelines and data for surgical site infection rates are unknown. Fear of getting infection and anticipating complications led to prolonged antibiotics use. CONCLUSION: The study provides an understanding of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis use and its implementation challenges. This was partly expressed by unavailability of local data and guidelines to enhance practice. To improve this, there is a need of guidelines that incorporates local resistance surveillance data and enhanced antibiotic stewardship programmes. A strong consideration should be placed into ways to combat the fears of surgeons for complications, as these significantly affect the current practise with use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis.


Asunto(s)
Profilaxis Antibiótica/tendencias , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Antibiótica/métodos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/métodos , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos/tendencias , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cirujanos/educación , Cirujanos/psicología , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/tratamiento farmacológico , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tanzanía , Centros de Atención Terciaria
16.
Anesth Analg ; 133(5): 1180-1186, 2021 11 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34415867

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated adverse reaction to heparin. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) are routinely anticoagulated with heparin before the initiation of bypass. Heparin is contraindicated, however, in patients with acute HIT, and alternatives to routine practice are often used. While guidelines have recently been published addressing this topic 10, there remains variance between institutions in how these cases are treated. Our goal was to better delineate practice trends in the diagnosis and management of HIT patients requiring CPB. METHODS: We surveyed members of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists (SCA) and the American Society for Extracorporeal Technology (AmSECT) using an online survey tool. RESULTS: We received 304 completed surveys (5.8% response rate), 75% completed by an anesthesiologist, and 24% by a perfusionist. The majority of respondents used clinical history and/or antibody testing (71% and 63%, respectively) to diagnose HIT. Seventy-five percent of respondents reported using an institutional protocol for HIT-CPB cases. Most respondents (89%) reported having at least 1 case in the last 3 years, with a total case experience of at least 785 cases (785 = the minimum number of cases in each case volume category × the number of respondents choosing that category). The strategy recommended in published guidelines, bivalirudin, was the most commonly reported alternative anticoagulation strategy (75%) used by respondents in HIT cases, with most (83%) using the activated clotting time (ACT) to monitor anticoagulation. CONCLUSIONS: Most responding SCA and AmSECT members reported that their institution used a protocol or guideline for HIT/CPB cases, and most guidelines directed the use of bivalirudin as an alternative anticoagulant. Various other methods such as plasmapheresis are also being used with success in this patient population. Further research, including comparison studies of alternative anticoagulant strategies, is required to elucidate the best approach to these difficult cases.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos , Puente Cardiopulmonar , Heparina/efectos adversos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Trombocitopenia/terapia , Anticoagulantes/inmunología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Contraindicaciones de los Procedimientos , Monitoreo de Drogas/tendencias , Sustitución de Medicamentos/tendencias , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Heparina/inmunología , Hirudinas , Humanos , Fragmentos de Péptidos/uso terapéutico , Plasmaféresis/tendencias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapéutico , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Trombocitopenia/inducido químicamente , Trombocitopenia/diagnóstico , Trombocitopenia/inmunología , Tiempo de Coagulación de la Sangre Total/tendencias
17.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 62(3): 469-475, 2021 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34274219

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) have an increased risk of lower limb amputation. Given the international wide variance in major amputations, the high mortality rates and follow up costs as well as the significantly reduced quality of life of patients with amputations, vascular diagnostics and vascular surgery treatments are of great importance for lower limb preservation in patients with PAD. This study examines these guideline based procedures in patients before a first lower limb amputation and PAD. METHODS: This was a retrospective longitudinal study. Data from a large German statutory health insurance scheme were examined on patients with first amputation of lower extremities and PAD between 2013 and 2015 (incidence). Pre-defined vascular diagnostic and vascular surgical procedures were considered, as specified by guidelines within inpatient and outpatient care in a defined time before lower limb amputation. RESULTS: The overall estimated incidence of lower extremity amputations in the total population was 0.12% from 2013 to 2015. Of these, 51.7% had PAD; 81.8% of patients received at least one vascular diagnostic measure and 61.0% a vascular surgery procedure before the lower extremity amputation. There were only minor variations in the use of diagnostic or surgical treatments between patients with major and minor amputation. In total, 63.9% of patients had vascular surgery before the incident major amputation compared with 60.0% of patients with a minor amputation. Noticeable regional differences were found ranging from 91% (Berlin) to 67% (Bremen) regarding diagnostic procedures provided before amputation, and from 83% (Hamburg) to 55% (Saxony-Anhalt) regarding vascular surgery before amputations. CONCLUSION: Of patients with PAD, 18.2% did not receive a vascular diagnostic examination before amputation as specified in the guidelines, which reflects an underuse of health services. In one third of patients who did not receive vascular surgery, major amputation probably could have been avoided.


Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica/tendencias , Angiografía de Substracción Digital/tendencias , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Ultrasonografía Doppler/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Vasculares/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Alemania , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Humanos , Recuperación del Miembro , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad Arterial Periférica/fisiopatología , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(7): e2118816, 2021 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34323982

RESUMEN

Importance: Adherence to oral anticoagulants (OACs) per guideline recommendations is crucial in reducing ischemic stroke and systemic thromboembolism in high-risk patients with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation. However, data on OAC use are underreported in China. Objective: To assess adherence to the Chinese Stroke Association or the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association's clinical management guideline-recommended prescription of OACs, the temporal improvement in adherence, and the risk factors associated with OAC prescriptions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This quality improvement study was conducted at 1430 participating hospitals in the Chinese Stroke Center Alliance (CSCA) among patients with ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation enrolled in the CSCA between August 1, 2015, and July 31, 2019. Exposure: Calendar year. Main Outcomes and Measures: Adherence to the Chinese Stroke Association or the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association's clinical management guideline-recommended prescribing of OACs (warfarin and non-vitamin K OACs, including dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) at discharge. Results: Among 35 767 patients (18 785 women [52.5%]; mean [SD] age, 75.5 [9.2] years) with previous atrial fibrillation at admission, the median CHA2DS2-VASc (cardiac failure or dysfunction, hypertension, age 65-74 [1 point] or ≥75 years [2 points], diabetes, and stroke, transient ischemic attack or thromboembolism [2 points]-vascular disease, and sex category [female]) score was 4.0 (interquartile range, 3.0-5.0); 6303 (17.6%) were taking OACs prior to hospitalization for stroke, a rate that increased from 14.3% (20 of 140) in the third quarter of 2015 to 21.1% (118 of 560) in the third quarter of 2019 (P < .001 for trend). Of 49 531 eligible patients (26 028 men [52.5%]; mean [SD] age, 73.4 [10.4] years), 20 390 (41.2%) had an OAC prescription at discharge, an increase from 23.2% (36 of 155) in the third quarter of 2015 to 47.1% (403 of 856) in the third quarter of 2019 (P < .001 for trend). Warfarin was the most commonly prescribed OAC (11 956 [24.2%]) and had the largest temporal increase (from 5.8% [9 of 155] to 20.7% [177 of 856]). Older age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] per 5 year increase, 0.89;95% CI, 0.89-0.90), lower levels of education (aOR for below elementary school, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95 ), lower income (aOR for ≤¥1000 [$154], 0.66; 95% CI, 0.59-0.73), having new rural cooperative medical scheme insurance (aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87-0.96), prior antiplatelet use (aOR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.66-0.74), having several cardiovascular comorbid conditions (including stroke or transient ischemic attack [aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.75-0.82], hypertension [aOR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.89], diabetes [aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99], dyslipidemia [aOR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.80-0.94], carotid stenosis [aOR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-0.98], and peripheral vascular disease [aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.90]), and admission to secondary hospitals (aOR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.68-0.74) or hospitals located in the central region of China (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.75-0.84) were associated with not being prescribed an OAC at discharge. Conclusions and Relevance: This quality improvement study suggests that, despite significant improvement over time, OAC prescriptions remained low. Efforts to increase OAC prescriptions, especially non-vitamin K OACs, are needed for vulnerable subgroups by age, socioeconomic status, and presence of comorbid conditions.


Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes/normas , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/tratamiento farmacológico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Administración Oral , Anciano , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , China , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Oportunidad Relativa , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Mejoramiento de la Calidad
20.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 10(13): e021084, 2021 07 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33998258

RESUMEN

Background SGLT-2 (sodium glucose transporter-2) inhibitors and GLP-1RAs (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists) effectively lowered cardiovascular risk in large clinical trials for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus at high risk for these complications, and have been recommended by guidelines. To evaluate the contemporary landscape in which these recommendations would be implemented, we examined the use of these medications according to clinical guideline practice. Methods and Results In the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey for 2017 to 2018, we defined compelling indications for SGLT-2 inhibitors by the presence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease, and for GLP-1RAs by the presence of established or high-risk atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, based on large clinical trials that have been incorporated in guideline recommendations of the American College of Cardiology and American Diabetes Association. We then evaluated use of these medications among patients with physician-diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. All analyses incorporated complex survey design to produce nationally representative estimates. A total 1104 of 9254 sampled individuals had type 2 diabetes mellitus, representing 10.6% (95% CI, 9.7%-11.6%) of the US population or 33.2 million adults nationally. Of these, 52.6% (95% CI, 47.7%-57.5%) had an indication for SGLT-2 inhibitors, 32.8% (95% CI, 28.8%-37.2%) for GLP-1RAs, and 26.6% (95% CI, 22.2%-31.7%) for both medications. During 2017 to 2018, 4.5% (95% CI, 2.4%-8.2%) were treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors and 1.5% (95% CI, 0.7%-3.2%) with GLP-1RAs. Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, heart failure, or chronic kidney disease were not independently associated with SGLT-2 inhibitor or GLP-1RA use in patients with diabetes mellitus. Conclusions Despite a large number of patients being eligible for guideline-recommended cardiorenal protective therapies, there are substantial gaps in the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs, limiting their public health benefits.


Asunto(s)
Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/tendencias , Receptor del Péptido 1 Similar al Glucagón/agonistas , Incretinas/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Biomarcadores/sangre , Glucemia/metabolismo , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/diagnóstico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Humanos , Incretinas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas Nutricionales , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Medición de Riesgo , Inhibidores del Cotransportador de Sodio-Glucosa 2/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...